#Rune 2 card list pictures drivers

In your case, the second card will be responsible for rendering the graphics on the additional monitors that are attached to it. The cards will operate independently of each other. However, different cards cannot be linked together to function as a GPU array (CrossFire or SLI), so you generally won't be able to use them together to render graphics in games. Yes, this can technically work-both cards will give you graphical output. You might see some advantages with some CUDA or OpenCL loads but YMMV. So in this particular scenario, it's not that useful.

#Rune 2 card list pictures drivers

Multiple graphics cards with conflicting drivers can cause problems with graphics-processor accelerated features in Photoshop. Using two graphics cards does not enhance Photoshop's performance. Photoshop currently doesn't take advantage of more than one graphics processor. Photoshop specifically suggests using one card for your output, and to use identical video cards. With some software, you can use a secondary/lesser card as a co-processor for specific tasks or simply pick one as a primary card.

With paired video cards, chances are your system will drop down to x8 PCIe lanes from x16, but there's little practical performance loss from this. I'd suggest cards of the same brand and roughly similar era (so an 800-1000 series) simply for driver compatibility. So yeah, you'd be able to drag programs between monitors, and what you're thinking of would be doable. I've run a third monitor on onboard video with some tweaks on Windows 8 and 10 with the primary monitors being on a separate video card, and that's roughly the worst case scenario. Practically, on more modern versions of Windows, it'll 'just work' for most tasks.įor Windows 7, they need to be the same driver (so Nvidia only or AMD only).